Re: why not a newer smaller unit?

Posted by Jim in Litchfield Park [162.158.141.30] on Tuesday, October 04, 2016 at 23:09:00 :

In Reply to: Re: why not a newer smaller unit? posted by Daryl in Oz [162.158.3.179] on Tuesday, October 04, 2016 at 04:01:43 :

I'll check this out.

Re: why not a newer smaller unit? - Milo in Pa 23:18:49 10/04/2016

Re: why not a newer smaller unit? - Jim in Litchfield Park 00:48:20 10/05/2016
Re: why not a newer smaller unit? - Jim in Litchfield Park 00:46:11 10/05/2016
- two simple tests - JohnD 06:58:42 10/06/2016
  - Re: two simple tests - Tom Petroff (IL) 07:56:16 10/06/2016

This board is powered by the Mr. Fong Device from Cyberarmy.com