Re: Correct

Posted by Paul (in NY) [12.64.126.147] on Friday, January 07, 2011 at 19:36:35 :

In Reply to: Correct posted by Paul (in NY) [12.64.152.237] on Friday, January 07, 2011 at 14:36:37 :

Steve, the problem child is the 318/360 Hydraulic Bell. Going out on a limb here, but to my knowledge Chrysler Production never coupled a NP-420 to a 318/360 Hydraulic Bell. When the 318/360's hit the trucks, the NP-435 was the new tranny on the block. Thus the hydraulic bell was designed to provide clearance with PTO's when mounted on 318/360's.

Paul

• How To; Pictorials for PW/M37/WC

Follow Ups:

• Re: Correct - Kaegi 20:58:17 01/07/2011
  • Good info, I did nto know that....ntxt - Paul (in NY) 21:03:40 01/07/2011
    • Re: Good info, I did nto know that....ntxt - Kaegi 22:56:05 01/07/2011
• Re: Correct - Tim Holloway 20:46:28 01/07/2011
  • Tim - Paul (in NY) 21:02:23 01/07/2011
    • Re: Tim - Tim Holloway 22:04:52 01/07/2011
      • 352/np435 picture - Paul (in NY) 23:08:21 01/07/2011
        • Re: 352/np435 picture - Jon Kelly 09:55:54 01/08/2011
          • Re: 352/np435 picture - Paul (in NY) 11:35:41 01/08/2011

Post a Followup