It can't be the first Power-Wagon

Posted by Clint Dixon on Friday, January 09, 2009 at 07:16:21 :

In Reply to: Re: yes but it may be posted by Mike Stone on Thursday, January 08, 2009 at 19:10:33 :

It does not have the early rear crossmember that would have been found on #1. Unless someone changed it out at one time.

Junior

Follow Ups:

• Re: It can't be the first Power-Wagon - Todd Wilson 10:20:15 01/09/2009
  • Re: It can't be the first Power-Wagon - Glenn Reid in CA 21:23:14 01/11/2009
  • Let's hope so - Clint Dixon 12:22:32 01/09/2009
    • Re: Let's hope so - Todd Wilson 17:43:27 01/09/2009

Post a Followup