|
|
Posted by Kevin Clause on Tuesday, November 25, 2008 at 22:24:50 :
In Reply to: Re: According to Kevin... posted by dave horvath on Tuesday, November 25, 2008 at 20:59:21 :
The complete drawing is 14 x 22. It doesn't exactly fit on my scanner. Todd Somers posted the overhead view earlier and here is the side view. These angles do not appear in the early drawings.
Dimension "G" is listed as 16.50 with a footnote. The footnote says "DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE LOADED RADII. ADD .50 FOR FRONT TIRE RADIUS & .50 FOR REAR TIRE RADIUS AT CURB WEIGHT." The tires shown are listed as 9 x 16, 8 or 10 ply on 16 x 6.50 rims. So with the truck not loaded down your angles would increase.
The drawing I sent Dave should have been 378KB and this here is 42.7KB. Did you guys do that? It could be a problem on my end. I sent it from home which I don't normally do. I have this flakey satellite service. Its ok for surfing the net but it doesn't like to download or send attachments. I can re-send it later from work.
Follow Ups: