Re:whats wrong with a 392 ?

Posted by mikey stone Idaho (aka COTM) on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 at 5:14PM :

In Reply to: Re: Saw the ultimate crewcab yesterday w/ 2.5 rockwells posted by Chris In Idaho on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 at 2:32PM :

depending upon which 392 it is torque goes
up to 450 or so
no slouch engine by any means

Follow Ups:

• Re:whats wrong with a 392 ? - Chris In Idaho 11:42AM 08/17/2006
  • Retire on your Hemi stash.... - Clint Dixon 12:33PM 08/17/2006
    • Re: Retire on your Hemi stash.... - Chris In Idaho 12:42PM 08/17/2006
      • Re: Retire on your Hemi stash.... - Clint Dixon (Curator of Antiquities) 7:45PM 08/17/2006
        • Re: Retire on your Hemi stash.... - keithmerk 6:11PM 08/18/2006
  • a truck that BIG needs a Detroit Diesel - mikey stone Idaho (aka COTM) 12:09PM 08/17/2006
    • That reminds me... - Michael Fanoni 12:16PM 08/17/2006
      • For 2-stroke Detroit Diesel interest... - Ken Dunnington 1:35PM 08/18/2006
      • Re: That reminds me... - MoparNorm 7:09PM 08/17/2006
        • Whoa - Michael Fanoni 0:09AM 08/18/2006
          • Re: Whoa - MoparNorm 9:18AM 08/18/2006
            • MN - Michael Fanoni 10:00AM 08/18/2006
              • Re: MN - MoparNorm 7:06PM 08/18/2006
• Re:whats wrong with a 392 ? - Paul (in NY) 6:37PM 08/16/2006
• Re:whats wrong with a 392 ? - Paul (in NY) 6:36PM 08/16/2006

Post a Followup